Comparative analysis for educational provided by Grok3 + author's info box(es)
·NOTICE·
This document has been created by Grok3 AI once initialized with the peer-review session prompt v3.4 to challenge the Nvidia Tesla K80 SW stack installation rev. 27 article and beyond. Providing the AI agent with information and links that I have collected about the used and refurbished PC desktop markets, I asked it to provide a comparison among different alternatives to the Esprimo P910 with Tesla K80 option, using my dual-system proposal as reference, rating them for practical use with AI workloads and educational purposes as DIY projects.
This paper is part of the Esprimo P910 w/ Tesla K80 installation manual serie.
Hello! I'm AleX, and I'll create a comprehensive comparison table for all the options you've suggested throughout our discussion. This includes your dual-system setup (P910 WS with GTX 1050 Ti + newer WS with Tesla K80), the Nvidia Shield pair, the recent Xbox (Series X), and the refurbished GTX 1050 Ti-equivalent WS, plus the higher-end refurbished WS with RTX 4060. The table will focus on key metrics for running a local AI agent with occasional training/fine-tuning: compute (CUDA cores, threads), memory (GPU and system RAM), cost-effectiveness (cores/€, MB/€), total cost, effort, and practical/educational ratings.
Criteria
Educational value hinges on knowledge gained, skills taught, and insights offered, even in failure. I'll rate this as a "claim" of educational merit, aligned with the document's perspective (a learning journey), using [RTS]:
100%: Universally valuable — teaches widely applicable skills and deep insights.
  90%: Valuable with minor gaps — strong lessons, slight limits in scope.
  75%: Plausible value — useful but unproven in broader impact.
  50%: Mixed value — equal strengths and weaknesses.
  25%: Limited value — minimal lessons, niche scope.